Indie Game: The Movie (2012)
Indie Game: The Movie is a genuinely fascinating documentary not only about the machinations video games industry but also the blood, sweat and tears that go into any creative process. It is a film that really does give you pause for thought and encourages you to reflect upon what you may want in life. It clearly shows the true cost and the star reality of any labour of love. It should be required viewing in schools and colleges for any wannabe who dreams of being on a reality shows and achieving a fast path to their perceived heart’s desire. Such is the impact of the documentary’s message.
Indie Game: The Movie is a genuinely fascinating documentary not only about the machinations video games industry but also the blood, sweat and tears that go into any creative process. It is a film that really does give you pause for thought and encourages you to reflect upon what you may want in life. It clearly shows the true cost and the star reality of any labour of love. It should be required viewing in schools and colleges for any wannabe who dreams of being on a reality shows and achieving a fast path to their perceived heart’s desire. Such is the impact of the documentary’s message.
Indie Game: The Movie focuses on four independent game developers. One, Jonathan Blow has already achieved success via his game Braid. This thoughtful, introspective man who has fulfilled his dream, still feels that his work has not been fully understood by the wider public. It becomes very clear that the creation of his game was not a purely financial undertaking and that he sees it as a wider artistic endeavour. His experiences are subsequently cross referenced against three other developers, labouring to bring their magnum opus to the commercial markets.
Edward McMillen and Tommy Refenes, the creators of Super Meat Boy (which has subsequently proven very successful) are shown burning the midnight oil and moving heaven and earth to meet the rigorous timetable set for them by Microsoft. It becomes very clear that although they want their game to do well commercially, the main thing is to create something akin to the games they grew up with. That is by far the most important thing to them. It is a very personal statement and it should resonate with any writer, musician or film maker.
Phil Fish is shown taking his game Fez to the PAX trade show. Four years in the making and still incomplete, he has to deal with the legal fallout of failed business partnership, along with impatient fans who have gone from eager consumers to rabid, disaffected trolls. The stress is very evident with both sets of developers, although they face different issues. One has the immediate problem of his family getting into debt to keep his dream afloat, another face potential legal action. All stare failure directly in the eyes. These aren't corporate executives with alleged nerves of steel. These are real people like you and I and it is quite traumatic watch.
Indie Game: The Movie depicts the independent gaming world as being equally blighted by corporate bullshit as any other industry. There are deadlines, small print and ever-changing goal posts. The work required is prodigious and there is little or no advance funding. Tommy Refenes, a diabetic to begin with, does not look well for a great deal of this documentary. The reality of the situation is back breaking work, a crappy diet, no social life, and the only light at the end of the tunnel being the possibility of scoring a hit. It is not glamorous, hip or a bohemian lifestyle choice. It certainly makes the mundane nature a lot of nine to five jobs look a lot more appealing.
On a side note this is a beautifully crafted piece of film making. It is handsomely shot and well edited, presenting the material in a palatable story arc. It is not overtly biased and although it references the developer’s views on the mainstream commercial gaming industry, it does not offer any overt soap boxes. Overall Indie Game: The Movie is about people making a personal creative and artistic statement and the consequences of doing so. In that respects the documentary has appeal beyond the confines of gaming. It is one of the most emotionally engaging documentarys that I have seen, and I heartedly recommend it.
World of Warcraft: Looking for Group (2014)
Despite having played a broad spectrum of games in my time, I've never really had much dealings with the Blizzard. Beyond owning Overwatch, a game I’ve long stopped playing and trying a free trial of both World of Warcraft and Hearthstone, I have little personal experience of their games. However, I am fully aware of their product range and their reputation within the gaming industry. Overwatch has taught me how well-conceived and polished their games can be. Blizzard may not be incredibly innovative, but they learn from others and produce titles with all the elements that work well. Sadly, I have no real affinity to their flagship MMORPG, as my point of entry with that genre was LOTRO. My interest in World of Warcraft mainly stems from a business perspective and the place it holds in gaming history. Overall my curiosity about the game, its community and culture is mainly academic. So, I finally got around to watching the documentary World of Warcraft: Looking for Group that showcased at Blizzcon in 2014 and was subsequently released on You Tube thereafter.
Despite having played a broad spectrum of games in my time, I've never really had much dealings with the Blizzard. Beyond owning Overwatch, a game I’ve long stopped playing and trying a free trial of both World of Warcraft and Hearthstone, I have little personal experience of their games. However, I am fully aware of their product range and their reputation within the gaming industry. Overwatch has taught me how well-conceived and polished their games can be. Blizzard may not be incredibly innovative, but they learn from others and produce titles with all the elements that work well. Sadly, I have no real affinity to their flagship MMORPG, as my point of entry with that genre was LOTRO. My interest in World of Warcraft mainly stems from a business perspective and the place it holds in gaming history. Overall my curiosity about the game, its community and culture is mainly academic. So, I finally got around to watching the documentary World of Warcraft: Looking for Group that showcased at Blizzcon in 2014 and was subsequently released on You Tube thereafter.
Despite being three years old and there being major changes to the game in that period, I was hoping that the hour-long film would be relatively informative about the MMO. Sadly, World of Warcraft: Looking for Group is a curious mix of marketing, nostalgia, talking heads and self-congratulation rather than an in-depth analysis of a financially successful game and cultural phenomenon. If you are looking for a rigorous dissection of how Blizzard created one of the most financially lucrative games ever and the way it changed the gaming landscape, then look elsewhere. This is not an independent analysis but more of an ode to the community and the fans. That in itself is not without merit and certainly it’s nice to see the community recognised. But it means that the discussion is somewhat partisan and contains all the tropes and memes one associates with modern day public relations. Viewers may well learn something of the game’s history, but it's not as thorough as some may hope and a lot of the sound bites from the players are somewhat generic. They are often applicable to any MMO.
Overall, I think that World of Warcraft: Looking for Group is ultimately meant as a tribute to the games player base, as a friendly “attaboy” or virtual high five for their loyalty and support over the years. Sometimes a bit of mutual back slapping goes a long way in buying good will. One thing is for certain; there aren't any other Western MMORPGs that warrant or could justify having such a documentary of this nature made about them. Blizzard's ongoing success with World of Warcaft is a prodigious feat and is attributal an esoteric mixture of skill, business acumen and being in the right place at the right time. The latter quality is possibly a reason why they haven’t seen fit to create a second game of this nature. Although metaphors about lightning striking twice are technically inaccurate, they certainly applicable in this case. So, if you have a history with World of Warcraft then you may wish to watch World of Warcraft: Looking for Group for a fix of nostalgia. For those seeking a more nuanced analysis, you may wish to try another gaming documentary, which appears to be a growing genre.
Jedi Junkies (2010)
Certain groups just lend themselves to ridicule from the media and in popular culture in general, irrespective of whether they deserve it or not. Star Wars fans are a prime example of this. Their love of the lore, predilection for cosplay and hunger for collectables at first glance makes them an easy target. Film maker Mark Edlitz, takes a decidedly different approach in his documentary Jedi Junkies. Instead of finger-pointing and making cheap jokes, Jedi Junkies puts a very human face on a group of enthusiasts, showing their passion to be in essence, no different to that of sports fans or other more mainstream hobbies and pastimes.
Certain groups just lend themselves to ridicule from the media and in popular culture in general, irrespective of whether they deserve it or not. Star Wars fans are a prime example of this. Their love of the lore, predilection for cosplay and hunger for collectables at first glance makes them an easy target. Film maker Mark Edlitz, takes a decidedly different approach in his documentary Jedi Junkies. Instead of finger-pointing and making cheap jokes, Jedi Junkies puts a very human face on a group of enthusiasts, showing their passion to be in essence, no different to that of sports fans or other more mainstream hobbies and pastimes.
Eduardo Sanchez with perosnal collection
The documentary follows a varied group of individuals as they indulge in their particular branch of fandom. We get to meet compulsive memorabilia collectors, the New York Jedis and their lightsabre displays, the tribute band Aerosith (that really made me chuckle) then the guy who decided to build a life-size replica of the Millennium Falcon in his yard. By and large, most of these fans come across very well, often showing a thoughtful and philosophical nature. However not all do though, with Mr Millennium Falcon being a little too self-satisfied. It isn't a particularly good replica anyway. But overall Jedi Junkies simply shows us people socialising among their peer groups, having fun through common interests. What could be more normal and healthy?
The New York Jedi lightsabre masterclass
Another thing that Mark Edlitz does in this film, is intersperse the footage of fans, with sound-bites from academics commenting on the nature of fandom, collecting and their respective social dynamics. What these professional opinions do is punctuate the documentary, allowing the viewer to make a considered opinion, rather than simply label the fans themselves. It’s a very important distinction. The section on cosplay, specifically the Leia Slave outfit is sensitively handled and certainly avoids condescension, objectification or simply being rude. These ladies surely get enough flak already.
Slave Leia cosplay
The wheel is slowly turning with regard to fandom. Niche market past times which previously were the prerogative of a few, are now high-profile moneymaking interests. It is curious how financial viability seems to eradicate traditional prejudice or scorn. However, fans have yet to reach the promised land and although Jedi Junkies is a measured look at their world, there are still people who will shake their heads at their choice of activities. It's a curious paradox that the fundamentals of collecting stamps are really no different to collecting Star Wars memorabilia and that the respective social acceptance of either group is arbitrary and subjective. Overall, I whole heartedly recommend Jedi Junkies. It is an excellent counterpoint to The People vs. George Lucas
The Vietnam War (2017)
After watching several hours of the documentary, The Vietnam War, one has to wonder at the utter inability of the US government of the time, to think outside the box during the period of that conflict. Seldom does a military, political, and social analysis of an historical event go this deep. During its eighteen hour running time directors Ken Burns and Lynn Novick cover a wealth of issues associated with this conflict, exploring it from multiple perspectives. Not only do they shine a light upon the hubris and folly of both respective governments, they manage to keep a very intimate and human perspective. Personal stories from both sides are told and if there is a common theme, it is sadly one of tragedy and regret.
After watching several hours of the documentary, The Vietnam War, one has to wonder at the utter inability of the US government of the time, to think outside the box during the period of that conflict. Seldom does a military, political, and social analysis of an historical event go this deep. During its eighteen hour running time directors Ken Burns and Lynn Novick cover a wealth of issues associated with this conflict, exploring it from multiple perspectives. Not only do they shine a light upon the hubris and folly of both respective governments, they manage to keep a very intimate and human perspective. Personal stories from both sides are told and if there is a common theme, it is sadly one of tragedy and regret.
The Vietnam War attempts to seek answers and to do so, starts the tale with the French colonization of Indochina. Burns and Novick then progress through the policies of three U.S. Presidents: Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon. But they also ensure that a Vietnamese perspective is maintained so they do not neglect the political turmoil and machinations of both North and South Vietnamese governments. There are numerous talking heads, both great and small during the course of the narrative. Soldiers, politicians and families provide candid insights into how the war impacted upon their lives. The documentary doesn’t forget the wider history of the time and there is much screen time dedicated to the US protest movement and how the war was greeted internationally.
There is a wealth of original news footage from the conflict, wisely chosen to highlight each point of discussion. It is often quite graphic and bleak. Yet this is how the news played out each night in homes around the world. The Vietnam War is not only a documentary about a military conflict but also one of how rolling news reshaped public opinion and brought an abstract, remote war starkly to the attention of the world. Something the US government did it best to contain but due to social and technological change, ultimately failed to do. There’s also a lot of audio recordings made by the US government, detailing meeting between the President LB Johnson, The secretary of Defence Robert McNamara and such like. These are utterly chilling because you soon get a sense that events have gone beyond their control, yet political considerations tie their hands and predetermine their course of action.
For me, what makes The Vietnam War stand out is the way it maintains a human perspective, despite the international nature of events. The story of Denton “Mogie” Crocker Jr runs throughout several episodes, following the honest dreams of a young man who believed in the moral rectitude of the war. Sadly, the reality of the situation soon became apparent to him and his tale ends in tragedy; just one tragedy among thousands on both sides. It’s a reoccurring theme, that so many soldiers were conscripted from small towns, frequently chosen from a specific social economic background and sent into a “no win” situation. Their commendable honesty and wholesome naivety is sharply contrasted by the hubris and obstinacy of both governments.
The Vietnam War is presented in ten substantial episodes. Like that definitive World War II documentary, The World at War, each strives to cover and explore a specific period of time and a particular milestone in the conflict. The events of the time are seen from multiple views and the documentary endeavours to be as even handed as it can. The soundtrack by Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross embellishes the proceeding without being too intrusive. There is also a healthy mix of popular music from the era, as well as news footage and commercials that help give the viewer a sense of the times. It would be remiss of me not to mention Peter Coyote’s narration, which never descends into melodrama. He clearly and succinctly describes the history of the war, subtly conveying the magnitude of events, allowing their own significance to give them weight. Overall, a major and often ignored part of American history is finally given the scrutiny that it deserves. It’s far from easy viewing but then again, the truth seldom is.
How Videogames Changed the World (2013)
Considering the mainstream popularity of gaming, there is a distinct lack of related content on television. Journalist, writer and social commentator Charlie Brooker attempted to address this in 2009 with Gameswipe but the show remained a one-off production. Then again in late 2013, he had another crack at the subject with the documentary How Videogames Changed the World, providing a broad overview on the genre, exploring key events and titles from the past forty years. As ever with Mr. Brooker, the commentary was intelligent and acerbic. There was also an interesting and diverse selection of talking heads who spoke from personal experience, rather than the usual scripted garrulous inanities.
Considering the mainstream popularity of gaming, there is a distinct lack of related content on television. Journalist, writer and social commentator Charlie Brooker attempted to address this in 2009 with Gameswipe but the show remained a one-off production. Then again in late 2013, he had another crack at the subject with the documentary How Videogames Changed the World, providing a broad overview on the genre, exploring key events and titles from the past forty years. As ever with Mr. Brooker, the commentary was intelligent and acerbic. There was also an interesting and diverse selection of talking heads who spoke from personal experience, rather than the usual scripted garrulous inanities.
The documentary covers a lot of ground, exploring a lot of the usual controversies and debating points that inevitably stem from gaming. The subject of violence is objectively pursued with a very even hand. The cathartic nature of managed fantasy compared against the mean-spirited nastiness of certain titles. Cyber-psychologist Berni Goode raises the matter of "flow; the concept of being totally absorbed in an activity. It would appear that gaming, like knitting can be very theraputic for low-level mental health issues, such as mild depression. Then off course there’s the thorny issue of sexism, misogyny and the objectification of women. Perhaps writer Keza MacDonald sums it up the best.
"It's not so much gaming culture that's unfriendly to women. It's internet culture".
How Videogames Changed the World is far from a male dominated undertaking, with women tech journalists and game writers being fully represented, by the likes of Kate Russell, Aoife Wilson and Rhianna Pratchet. The ubiquitous Felicia Day also makes an appearance; however it would have been a serious omission not to have done so. The show also references Anita Sarkeesian and Feminist Frequency and the associated hate campaign that has arisen. The old chestnut regarding whether game icon Lara Croft is a role model and an empowered female, or just a male fantasy is dutifully trotted out, with surprising results. One conclusion was that over the last three decades, in-game avatars have evolved beyond their original questionably purpose into clearly defined characters. Commander Shepard being a prime example of this.
What How Videogames Changed the World manages to achieve is show how gaming had become a mainstream cultural norm. The rise of "inclusional" gaming via the Nintendo Wii and the significance of Minecraft as educational tool demonstrates the wider impact of games. The rise of e-sports seems to have put pay to the notion that people don't want to watch other people play games. People often find the undertaking of any competitive, skilled based activity to be compelling viewing. Comedian Dara O' Briain also layed to rest the rather tedious argument that gaming is a solitary pastime of little value. A sound-bite that is frequently espoused by those who's major leisure activity is passively watching television.
Given the ninety-minute running time and the scope of the project, it would be unfair to expect How Videogames Changed the World to be the last word on the subject matter. It does however choose a very eclectic selection of key titles to validate its arguments such a Shadow of the Colossus and PaRappa the Rapper. The documentary does not make the fatal mistake that many gamers do, of being too defensive about that which they are passionate about. The unpleasant world of FPS culture and trash talk is not justified in any way and shown for exactly what it is. Mr. Brooker also shows how games had developed a greater sense of narrative depth and social conscience with titles such a Papers Please and The Last of Us.
Perhaps the real reason why gaming has not become a regular feature of the television schedules, is because it has outgrown that particular medium. May be Twitch TV and the like are now the true home of gaming, providing content, news and information on demand direct to a suitable platform. Certainly, the integration of gaming and social media continues, as the next-gen consoles so clearly demonstrate. It can even be argued that Twitter itself is a form of "gamification". Overall it seems that it is not just the technology but the culture and even the ideology of gaming that continues to bleed out in to popular culture.
How Videogames Changed the World is unfortunately no longer available on the 4OD website. However, I would suggest a search of YouTube as an alternative source. Sadly, there are precious few quality documentaries about gaming at present. What is available is either too niche or made by those who are a little too close to the subject, thus lacking in objectivity. Therefore How Videogames Changed the World comes highly recommended to both lifelong gamers and those who have an interest in what "all the fuss is about".
Being Elmo: A Puppeteer's Journey (2011)
Constance Marks’ documentary explores the story of Kevin Clash, the man who effectively "was" Seasame Street's Elmo until 2014. The film charts Kevin Clash's rise from his modest beginnings in Baltimore to his success as a globally famous character and a major player in the Henson family of puppeteers. The documentary manages to maintain a good balance between examining the mechanics of puppetry and focusing on the human impact of Kevin's work. Like so many documentaries of these type, it clearly shows that achieving your dreams always comes with a cost and is often immensely arduous. It also reveals the complexity of something we take for granted and possibly trivialise, namely puppetry. Filmed in 2011 the documentary does not cover Kevin Clash’s resignation from “Seasame Workshop” three years later.
Constance Marks’ documentary explores the story of Kevin Clash, the man who effectively "was" Seasame Street's Elmo until 2014. The film charts Kevin Clash's rise from his modest beginnings in Baltimore to his success as a globally famous character and a major player in the Henson family of puppeteers. The documentary manages to maintain a good balance between examining the mechanics of puppetry and focusing on the human impact of Kevin's work. Like so many documentaries of these type, it clearly shows that achieving your dreams always comes with a cost and is often immensely arduous. It also reveals the complexity of something we take for granted and possibly trivialize, namely puppetry. Filmed in 2011 the documentary does not cover Kevin Clash’s resignation from “Seasame Workshop” three years later.
With a subject such as this, it would be very easy for director Constance Mark to substitute narrative for sentiment but this is conspicuously avoided. A very emotive scene in which a terminally ill child meets Elmo is handled extremely well, focusing on Kevin Clash's professionalism. It is his job to make his or rather Elmo’s fans happy and that is what he does. It is emotional trauma such as this along with the practical logistics of spending hours contorted behind sets with your arm held up for hours, that shows what a difficult job puppetry is. The documentary even briefly touches upon the notion of the puppeteer surrendering their identity to the puppet, highlighting a curious aspect of this particular career path.
Perhaps the most pertinent criticism that can be made about Being Elmo: A Puppeteer's Journey, is that it leans a little too much towards veneration and as a result do get the full measure of the man. Kevin loves his work and is highly motivated. Elmo is very much a character about love and giving. Perhaps the documentary could have explored more precisely his motivation and the consequences of being so "giving". There is a brief reference to an ex-wife but the viewer simply has to assume the exact circumstances that led to their breakup. I'm not advocating that the man's personal life should have been laid bare but it would have been interesting to have looked beyond his professional life.
Clash has stated since the documentary that his sexuality and ethnicity were pertinent to his work. I tend to avoid armchair psychology, but there's no argument that there's is a lot of Kevin in Elmo and vice versa. The documentary makes that self-evident. However, it is curious that some African-American adults have been surprised when they’ve met him. I wonder exactly what they were expecting? As for the children, perhaps they are the best arbiters of Kevin's talent. They tend to speak and interact directly with Elmo, even when Kevin is clearly operating him. He is simply ignored. It provides compelling proof of the power of both puppetry and love.
Comic-Con Episode IV: A Fan's Hope (2011)
Documentaries about the fans and fandom often lack any impartiality and frequently have their own agenda, be it positive or negative. Looking at the names associated with Comic-Con Episode IV: A Fan's Hope, it’s fairly clear from the outset that this is not going to be an overtly critical undertaking. Director Morgan Spurlock follows five attendees during San Diego Comic-Con 2010 as they endeavour to fulfil their ambitions. The fans are immediately presented in a fairly positive way and as the documentary proceeds the viewer gets the opportunity to form their own opinion about the lifestyles, choices and philosophies. The documentary is also interspersed with talking heads from known genre luminaries such a Joss Wheedon, Kevin Smith and Stan Lee, who provide some interesting and quite frank views on Comic-Con as well as the wider fan scene.
Documentaries about the fans and fandom often lack any impartiality and frequently have their own agenda, be it positive or negative. Looking at the names associated with Comic-Con Episode IV: A Fan's Hope, it’s fairly clear from the outset that this is not going to be an overtly critical undertaking. Director Morgan Spurlock follows five attendees during San Diego Comic-Con 2010 as they endeavour to fulfil their ambitions. The fans are immediately presented in a fairly positive way and as the documentary proceeds the viewer gets the opportunity to form their own opinion about the lifestyles, choices and philosophies. The documentary is also interspersed with talking heads from known genre luminaries such a Joss Wheedon, Kevin Smith, Harry Knowles and Stan Lee, who provide some interesting and quite frank views on Comic-Con as well as the wider fan scene.
While Comic-Con Episode IV: A Fan's Hope does not wallow too much in the excesses of fandom it does not avoid all criticism. Joss Wheedon speaks of how what used to be an exclusive geek scene has now become a much broader event that is cynically exploited by the bean-counters. Veteran comic dealer Chuck, who is one of the focal points of the documentary, mourns the decline in the comic scene within the convention itself. There is a lot of truth in what he says and the commercial success of Comic-Con certainly has not been to the benefit of all. There are also some comments that do seem to validate some of common stereotypes about fans. There is talk of the "smell" of Comic-Con and some rather disdainful remarks about “counterfeit geeks” or “geek-for-a-week” tourists.
Out of the six or so subjects of the documentary, perhaps it is the aspirations of the two illustrators Eric and Skip that are best explored and offer the best drama. This is because they are seeking gainful employment and the chance to alter their lives as they hawk their portfolios between publishing houses. Their obsession is presented in a positive manner, where the adventures of the action figure collector seems far more self-indulgent. Costume designer Holly Conrad and her colleagues foray into the world of cosplay is both absorbing and honest. After spending a year creating their Mass Effect tribute costumes their dedication at times becomes a little manic. Tempers fray during cosplay rehearsals yet perhaps that is understandable considering the pressure and effort. As for the so called "lovers" and the alleged surprise proposal whilst at Comic-Con, it's the least edifying part of the documentary.
Although an enjoyable insight into a growing aspect of popular culture, Comic-Con Episode IV: A Fan's Hope is not a truly definitive or unbiased documentary and does not pretend to be one. It is fairly safe portal into the world of fandom for those on the outside, which removes some of the scenes rough edges, as well as being an ode to geekdom from those who have grown up with it. It does make a few points about the commercialisation of this particular phenomenon but doesn't offer any in-depth critique or solutions. Instead it settles for being a celebration of geek culture and focusing on the aspirational dreams of many of its participants, which is a worthy and positive spin on the proceedings.
Mifune: The Last Samurai (2016)
The documentary Mifune: The Last Samurai is both an exploration and celebration of the Japanese actor Toshiro Mifune (1920-1997), narrated by Keanu Reeves. Over the course of seventy minutes his life and body of work is critiqued by his industry peers as well as several cinematic luminaries such as Martin Scorsese and Steven Speilberg. The focus is very much upon the man himself, as his personality was integral to his acting technique. For those unfamiliar with classic Japanese cinema during its golden age, the documentary provides a broad and practical overview. It also includes a brief history of the chanbara (sword fighting) genre, as well as a concise and honest analysis of Mifune’s career.
The documentary Mifune: The Last Samurai is both an exploration and celebration of the Japanese actor Toshiro Mifune (1920-1997), narrated by Keanu Reeves. Over the course of seventy minutes his life and body of work is critiqued by his industry peers as well as several cinematic luminaries such as Martin Scorsese and Steven Speilberg. The focus is very much upon the man himself, as his personality was integral to his acting technique. For those unfamiliar with classic Japanese cinema during its golden age, the documentary provides a broad and practical overview. It also includes a brief history of the chanbara (sword fighting) genre, as well as a concise and honest analysis of Mifune’s career.
Writer and director, Steven Okazaki, talks to long time Mifune collaborators such as the actress Kyoko Kagawa and Kanzo Uni, a sword-fight choreographer and stunt co-ordinator. Uni claims that Mifune “killed” him on screen more than one hundred times. The actress Terumi Niki discusses how Toshiro Mifune coaxed and teased performances out of his co-stars during the filming of Red Beard and how he was a very generous actor. There are also some insightful anecdotes about Mifune’s youth and war experiences from his son, Shirô, that help explain the man’s temperament, strengths and vices. One actor describes Mifune star presence as the embodiment of perseverance but it is fair to say that melancholia is more appropriate for his personal life.
Mifune: The Last Samurai works best when it is focusing on the lifelong collaboration between Toshiro Mifune and writer/director Akira Kurosawa. It becomes very apparent from the interviews that the mutual respect between the two was immense, with the precise and exacting auteur director, trusting his lead implicitly and affording them a great deal of creative freedom. Mifune also had a strong sense of obligation to Kurosawa as he found fame and international stardom through his movies. Teruyo Nogami, Kurosawa’s regular script supervisor, recollects how the arrow ridden finale of Throne of Blood, was filmed under what would now be deemed hazardous conditions with the archers being mere college students and not particularly accurate shots. Yet Toshiro Mifune embraced the risk and used it to fuel his performance.
Mifune: The Last Samurai concentrates mainly on the chanbara movies that were an integral part of the actor’s enduring legacy. Sadly, the contemporary set, post war dramas such as The Bad Sleep Well and High and Low are somewhat ignored. Mifune’s later international success is also only briefly touched upon. It is clear that director Steven Okazaki, thinks that the main story of the actor’s life is his symbiotic relationship with Kurosawa. Although it does attempt to explain why the two artists drifted apart in their twilight years, one is left with the impression that perhaps the documentary is deliberately trying to perpetuate an enigma. In the end, it is Martin Scorsese’s conjecture, that sometimes artists that are bound this closely together “use each other up” is perhaps the most plausible explanation.
Becoming Bond (2017)
Becoming Bond is a curious documentary in so far as it’s totally dependent on whether the viewer believes the story that George Lazenby tells. Because George is obviously a well-practised raconteur one gets the impression that many of the anecdotes and vignettes he recounts have been embellished for artistic effect. He has that easy going, informal Australian charm and frequently smiles ironically, as director Josh Greenbaum, quizzes him off camera over the voracity of his tale. Mr. Lazenby also treads that fine line between being a likeable rogue and a bit of a dick, especially when he focuses on his youth. Yet he broadly keeps to the right side of this and maintains the audiences’ good will.
Becoming Bond is a curious documentary in so far as it’s totally dependent on whether the viewer believes the story that George Lazenby tells. Because George is obviously a well-practised raconteur one gets the impression that many of the anecdotes and vignettes he recounts have been embellished for artistic effect. He has that easy going, informal Australian charm and frequently smiles ironically, as director Josh Greenbaum, quizzes him off camera over the voracity of his tale. Mr. Lazenby also treads that fine line between being a likeable rogue and a bit of a dick, especially when he focuses on his youth. Yet he broadly keeps to the right side of this and maintains the audiences’ good will.
As he recounts his life story from his impoverished youth in Australia, to his days as a car salesman then a male model, the vignettes play out as an episodic drama. Josh Lawson (Superstore, House of Lies) plays Lazenby and there are several high-profile cameos from the likes of Jeff Garlin as Bond movie producer Harry Saltzman, former Bond Girl Jane Seymour as George's agent. These scenes usually have a comic tone, which at times come dangerously close to undermining the credibility of George’s story. Yet as soon as the narrative approaches such a tipping point, it’s reined in with a smile and a nod from Mr. Lazenby. There’s also a curiously melancholic streak in the proceeding with a reoccurring tale of a love lost.
George Lazenby is certainly not afraid of sharing his faults, making no attempt to dodge some of the less edifying aspects of his life and personality. He is also candid about his perceived arrogance which may be more of a failure by others to understand and appreciate Australian cultural foibles. When the story finally arrives at 1968 when Eon Productions were recasting the role of Bond, things become a lot clearer. Lazenby simply didn’t fully appreciate the consequences of taking onboard the most prodigious movie role of the time. He approached it in good faith and seemed to have fun making the actual film, yet he couldn’t cope with the requirements of stardom both leading up to and after the shoot. Certainly, the slave contract he was offered by Saltzman and Broccoli was iniquitous and would have driven any sane actor mad.
By the end of Becoming Bond, although I cannot say that I was fully conversant with the exact reasons why this man walked away from a six-movie contract and a million pounds in cash, I had a good idea. George Lazenby just wanted to be himself and not forever in the shadow of James Bond. Curiously enough, the late Roger Moore felt quite the opposite but that’s folk for you. No two are exactly alike. I genuinely felt sorry for the way that Lazenby was effectively hounded out of the movie industry, never having been a fan of closed shops or those with a strangle holds over certain businesses. Yet he found contentment in real estate, subsequently raised a family and seems to have come to terms with it all. Whether it all played out the way he tells it is debatable but he certainly offers viewers an entertaining autobiography to consider.
Filmed in Supermarionation (2014)
Trying to encapsulate any artists body of work is a difficult enough task in itself. To then attempt to distil all associated anecdotes, vignettes and legends, while dispensing with the apocrypha, complicates matters further. Yet that's exactly what film maker Stephen La Rivière has done. The documentary Filmed in Supermarionation, is possibly the definitive history of the work of Gerry Anderson from 1957 to 1968. This insightful, meticulously researched exploration charts the rise of AP Films from its humble beginnings, to the halcyon days of Thunderbirds and the studios transition to Century 21 Productions. It also sheds some light into how things rather rapidly came to an end in the late sixties..
Trying to encapsulate any artists body of work is a difficult enough task in itself. To then attempt to distil all associated anecdotes, vignettes and legends, while dispensing with the apocrypha, complicates matters further. Yet that's exactly what film maker Stephen La Rivière has done. The documentary Filmed in Supermarionation, is possibly the definitive history of the work of Gerry Anderson from 1957 to 1968. This insightful, meticulously researched exploration charts the rise of AP Films from its humble beginnings, to the halcyon days of Thunderbirds and the studios transition to Century 21 Productions. It also sheds some light into how things rather rapidly came to an end in the late sixties.
Because Gerry Anderson is such an iconic figure in the world of popular culture there have been many attempts to delineate his career. Rather than simply retread familiar ground, Stephen La Rivière focuses upon the production crew and tells the story from their perspective. Over the course of two hours viewers are treated to an extremely interesting reunion of writers, directors, voice artists and puppeteers as they revists the Slough industrial unit that was once the home of AP Films. The interviews and various talking heads are linked by some wonder new material featuring Lady Penelope and Parker (lovingly voiced by the original artists Sylvia Anderson and David Graham). There is also extensive archive interviews with the late Gerry Anderson himself.
It is fascinating to consider that although making puppet shows for children was the farthest thing from Gerry's mind, when he formed a production company in 1957, it was still undertaken with great professionalism. Filmed in Supermaionation shows that the early shows, filmed at Islet Park in Maidenhead, were made on a wing and a prayer. Yet it was the team spirit and camaraderie that kept the business on track. By the time that Lew Grade became involved with the financing and the team had moved to Ipswich Road studios on the Slough Trading Estate, the entire production process had become a finely tuned machine. Yet the success and popularity of shows such as Fireball XL5 and Stingray did not seem to register with many of the cast and crew. It was still just an enjoyable, paying gig to them.
It is this quality that makes Filmed in Supermarionation so absorbing. There's a wealth of personal stories told from the voice artists perspective, such as Nicholas Parsons (Tex Tucker in Four Feather Falls), Shane Rimmer (Scott Tracy), Elizabeth Morgan (Destiny Angels) Matt Zimmerman (Alan Tracy) and even Robert Easton(Phones). The effects, art and directing departments are also well represented by Brian Johnson, Alan Pattillo, Desmond Saunders ( a total character), Alan Perry and Mike Trim. They also share some of their behind the scenes secrets and recreate some of the effects work for the viewers edification. The documentary also acknowledges the importance of Sylvia Andersons contributions to the studio output and pivotal role she played. It acknowledges the impact that breakdown of the Anderson's marriage had upon the business but it does not take sides or dish any dirt.
Sometimes films of this nature can be a little myopic when it comes to exploring some of the negative aspects of the matter in hand. This is not the case with Filmed in Supermaionation which tackles why the two Thunderbirds feature films failed at the box office. In fact some of the conjecture is very interesting and the simple fact that movie spinoffs were simply not "a thing" back then sounds very plausible in its simplicity. The fact that the final Supermarionation show, The Secret Service may have fallen victim to changing tastes and a studio over reaching itself is also honestly addressed. The closing anecdotes about Gerry Anderson taking up a suite of offices at Pinewood and the Slough studios being cleared and all contents destroyed is very poignant.
To effectively and efficiently tell a tale such as this, a film maker has to be realistic about what is and isn't covered. The two hour running time does not out stay it's welcome but director Stephen La Rivière has stated that about forty minutes of additional material had to excised from the documentary to accommodate a practical running time. The invaluable contribution that both Barry Gray and Derek Meddings made to the world of Supermarionation is unequivocally referenced. It's a shame that more time was not devoted to them but you just “can't get a quart in a pint pot”. As the documentary is exclusively about Gerry Anderson's Supermarionation shows, UFO, Space:1999, Terrahawks and Space Precinct are not referenced. The documentary focuses, quite rightly, on Thunderbirds which remains the jewel in the Anderson's crown.
Filmed in Supermarionation is subtle blend of a fan’s love for the object of their affection, as well as being a thorough critique of one of the UK's greatest technical innovators and consummate storytellers. Those who worked with the Andersons are still slightly bemused by the sheer impact their work had upon subsequent generations. Yet the documentary succinctly highlights all the reasons why these shows have remained so enduring. Perhaps the most important one is the sheer love that was poured into these productions by all involved. David Graham's closing ode to Parker regarding the impact the character had upon his life was very touching. I think it reflects the way the public continues to feel about Gerry Anderson’s unique and much loved body of work.
I Am Bruce Lee (2012)
Because of Bruce Lee's iconic status within popular culture there has been a wealth of material produced about him since his death. The problem lies in trying to determine what is relevant, genuine information and what is hearsay and cant. To put not too fine a point on it, there is an entire market dedicated to peddling bullshit about the man. So, I was suitably sceptical about the 2012 documentary I am Bruce Lee when it was first released. However, as Bruce Lee’s daughter, Shannon, was an executive producer and the film was officially sanctioned by the Lee estate, I felt that there was some scope for further insight in to the man.
Because of Bruce Lee's iconic status within popular culture there has been a wealth of material produced about him since his death. The problem lies in trying to determine what is relevant, genuine information and what is hearsay and cant. To put not too fine a point on it, there is an entire market dedicated to peddling bullshit about the man. So, I was suitably sceptical about the 2012 documentary I am Bruce Lee when it was first released. However, as Bruce Lee’s daughter, Shannon, was an executive producer and the film was officially sanctioned by the Lee estate, I felt that there was some scope for further insight in to the man.
Having now watched the documentary, I do feel that the results are somewhat varied. I am Bruce Lee covers a lot of familiar ground initially, referencing his youth in Hong Kong, his "legendary" fights and his subsequent move to the US. It also explores Lee’s frustration with the film and TV industry. The script is concise but hardly new. It also glosses over certain facts pertaining to his marriage and family life. There is also a very broad selection of talking heads, offering their take on the man, his skills and philosophy. Some are edifying and others are not so. However, what is highlighted is the influence that Bruce Lee had and continues to have with a broad spectrum of people. Particularly musicians and performing artists, as well as those dedicated to martial arts. His ethnicity also seems to play a key role, casting him as the "outsider" to the perceived establishment.
Where I think I am Bruce Lee specifically fails is with regard to Lee’s impact upon mixed martial arts in the US. Not being an expert myself, I was confronted with differing opinions and not given any clear insight about which point of view was right. If the conclusion was that the debate is still ongoing, then even that gets lost in the overall white noise. Furthermore, this aspect of the documentary was a stark contrast to the philosophical musings of Bruce Lee. For me this was the best part of the documentary, as it portrayed him as a genuine thinker and artist across many disciplines. Lee was a keen believer in adapting and assimilating any knowledge and skills that were beneficial to his life. His musing on simply “being human” were quite scholarly.
Overall I am Bruce Lee is a good starting point for those who are interested in the man and wish to go beyond the apocrypha and myths. It certainly is not the definitive exploration of his legend but it may well inspire people to look further. It does confirm, through a wealth of vintage interviews and home video footage, that Bruce Lee had an inherent star quality and was a deep thinker as well as a superb martial artist. His words still speak clearly for themselves today and there really is no requirement for further testimony to this affect from Mickey Rourke and a host of other curiously chosen pundits.
Five Came Back (2017)
Five Came Back is a fascinating documentary about five remarkable Hollywood film directors who put themselves in harm’s way to film World War II for the US War Department. William Wyler, Frank Capra, George Stevens, John Ford and John Huston were in many ways a diverse bunch, yet the all represented a different facet of “America”. Certainly, all were idealists who felt it was their duty to use their talents to create accessible propaganda for the US public and more importantly, the 12 million men who were drafted. Despite the factual accuracy of this three-part documentary, there is an inherent romance to the tale and the way these Hollywood mavericks took on first American Isolationism, then the Third Reich and US military politics.
Five Came Back is a fascinating documentary about five remarkable Hollywood film directors who put themselves in harm’s way to film World War II for the US War Department. William Wyler, Frank Capra, George Stevens, John Ford and John Huston were in many ways a diverse bunch, yet the all represented a different facet of “America”. Certainly, all were idealists who felt it was their duty to use their talents to create accessible propaganda for the US public and more importantly, the 12 million men who were drafted. Despite the factual accuracy of this three-part documentary, there is an inherent romance to the tale and the way these Hollywood mavericks took on first American Isolationism, then the Third Reich and US military politics.
Narrated by Meryl Streep and based upon the Mark Harris Five Came Back: A Story of Hollywood and the Second World War, this Netflix documentary cleverly intercuts the story of these five legendary film makers, with soundbites from contemporary Hollywood luminaries, Steven Spielberg, Paul Greengrass, Guillermo del Toro, Francis Ford Coppola and Laurence Kasdan. It is here that the show excels itself, as these modern film makers clearly have a great deal of love and reverence for their predecessors and how they advanced the craft of film making. Greengrass, who comes from a documentary film making background is especially observant and analytical of John Ford’s urgent style. His genuine use of shaking footage, sprocket jumps and loss of focus has now become a mainstay of film makers trying to capture the authenticity he experienced.
Five Came Back these focuses on how these directors changed the public perception of the war in the US. There personal heritage played heavily on their motivation and creative output. Ford was a traditional American conservative, where Wyler and Capra were both immigrants, yet they all clearly saw the threat of Fascism and wished to contribute to the war effort. It was the fact that they were all old school film directors that gave them their specific edge. They were natural leaders, autocratic and skilled in marshalling logistics and people. George Stevens made films for the US Army Signal Corps and William Wyler made documentaries for the US Air Force. Frank Capra, was tasked with creating the documentary series Why We Fight to boost US troop morale. His master stroke was to take Leni Riefenstahl’s Nazi propaganda film Triumph of the Will and to lampoon and satirise it, making it look foolish and puerile.
Five Came Back explores the nature of propaganda and how cinema and newsreels played a key role during World War II. Over half of the US population went to the movie theatre every week and so the medium became the logical means to convey information and boost morale. Wyler, Ford, Capra, Stevens and Huston all experienced war via some of the most ferocious campaigns. North Africa, the landings in Southern Italy, D-Day and the Battle of Midway. They produced films that still pack an emotional punch today and each came home changed men. Curiously enough it can be argued that their personal experiences fuelled their finest work. Consider Shane (1953), It’s a Wonderful Life (1946), The Searchers (1956), The Best Years of Our Lives (1946) and The Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948).
Side by Side (2012)
Keanu Reeves both presents and produces the intelligent and compelling documentary Side by Side, offering a very interesting insight into the changing world of film. The production discusses with over forty directors, cinematographers, editors, producers and technical innovators the rapid replacement of traditional photochemical film with digital technology. It's a story of science versus art and emotion. How the practitioners of traditional methods are coping with the reality of change and it is a seismic change. It impacts upon the way films are made and by whom, how they're perceived, produced, exhibited, experienced and preserved. Side by Side explores whether the democratisation of film making will destroy the art of cinema.
Keanu Reeves both presents and produces the intelligent and compelling documentary Side by Side, offering a very interesting insight into the changing world of film. The production discusses with over forty directors, cinematographers, editors, producers and technical innovators, the rapid replacement of traditional photochemical film with digital technology. It's a story of science versus art and emotion. How the practitioners of traditional methods are coping with the reality of change and it is a seismic change. It impacts upon the way films are made and by whom, how they're perceived, produced, exhibited, experienced and preserved. Side by Side explores whether the democratisation of film making will destroy the art of cinema or release it.
Virtually every major talent in contemporary film making is here. From digital pioneers and zealots, such as James Cameron and Danny Boyle to stalwart traditionalists like Christopher Nolan and his resident director of photography Wally Pfister. Passions runs high and the language is strong at times. Mr Pfister firmly states “I’m not going to trade my oil paints for a set of crayons.” Other opinions range from embracing the inevitable to welcoming a new challenge. In accordance with the documentary's title, the proceedings are fairly even handed and balanced. Side by Side also gives a great insight into each individual artists relationship with film, some of which are quite surprising. I even went so far as to revise my opinion of George Lucas after he was given an opportunity to speak freely.
The technical nature of the underlying discussion does make this a niche market documentary. Yet it is very compelling all the same, providing a very pertinent view into an evolving industry. It also reaches positive conclusions about the future of film making and that the medium is not destined to collapse due to the sheer volume of mediocre amateur productions. Quality, ability and raw talent will simply adapt to the new tools and rise to the top. However, it is acknowledged that the ongoing change will continue to have some negative impacts. The digital era in providing new methods of product delivery does lead to the diminishing of older ways. There is an air of sadness and loss for the old days, when cinema was a far more communal and shared experience.
I first watched Side by Side in 2012 upon it's initial release. Brian and I also discussed it at length on the Contains Moderate Peril podcast. Five years on, after a second viewing and a little further research, it would appear that all the predictions made in the documentary have come true. The majority of all cinema releases are shot digitally and photochemical film is usually only used if the cost can be justified. Event movies such a Tarantino's The Hateful Eight, which was shot using theUltra Panavision 70, being a prime example. As far as cinema projection goes, this too is now predominantly digital. Although convenience is a major factor, automation has resulted in a loss of technical understanding. I have on several occassions watched film shown in the wrong aspect ratio. As a result Side by Side can now be seen not so much as a phrophetic documentary but more as a historical dissertation.
Birth of the Living Dead (2013)
These day’s zombies are a somewhat ubiquitous plot device and enjoy an entire literary, artistic and cinematic sub-genre. The Walking Dead is one of the most popular TV shows internationally and hundreds of thousands of gamers fight the undead, online every day. Yet there was a time when zombies were just a minor subset of the horror genre and far from a popular one. That all changed in 1968, when a low-budget, independent film called Night of the Living Dead was released upon an unsuspecting public. The movie’s impact upon the film industry and popular culture was extraordinary. Rob Kuhns’ appropriately titled documentary Birth of the Living Dead analyses the creation of George A. Romero’s seminal classic and strives to determine how a single movie could have such impact.
These day’s zombies are a somewhat ubiquitous plot device and enjoy an entire literary, artistic and cinematic sub-genre. The Walking Dead is one of the most popular TV shows internationally and hundreds of thousands of gamers fight the undead, online every day. Yet there was a time when zombies were just a minor subset of the horror genre and far from a popular one. That all changed in 1968, when a low-budget, independent film called Night of the Living Dead was released upon an unsuspecting public. The movie’s impact upon the film industry and popular culture was extraordinary. Rob Kuhns’ appropriately titled documentary Birth of the Living Dead analyses the creation of George A. Romero’s seminal classic and strives to determine how a single movie could have such impact.
The then 27-year-old Romero, learnt his craft working for local television (mainly children shows) and producing commercials via his company Latent Image. Relative success and ambition lead to a decision to make a movie and it was determined that a horror production would be cheapest to make. It was also potentially the most lucrative. Having previously read Richard Matheson’s novel I Am Legend, Romero decided to adapt one of his own short stories into the movie. The project was financed via friends and business partner who all contributed the grand sum of $600 each. Film stock was bought, an abandoned farmhouse was rented and the guerrilla-style production commenced. “Who knew that we were ever going to finish this thing” Romero has retrospectively stated.
Kuhns specifically explores Night of the Living Dead in the social and political context of the era, focusing on the radical casting of African-American actor Duane Jones in the lead role. The character’s race was unspecified in the script and the fact that it’s never a narrative issue in the film itself was particularly ground breaking at time. Sidney Poitier was a major box office star in the late sixties, yet there were still major cultural constraints on the depiction of black characters in mainstream movies. The documentary also focuses on the social and political climate of America at the time and the fact that much of the prevailing cultural angst seems to have seeped into the finished movie.
Where Birth of the Living Dead succeeds the most is in cataloguing the minor and more mundane aspects of the film’s production. For example, one of the investors provided real entrails as they ran a meat packing business. A genuine television news broadcaster played such a character the film, authentically writing his own dialogue. Most of the cast members performed additional roles, including designing the producing the makeup effects and local residents were recruited to play the marauding zombie hordes. Full co-operation was gained from the local law enforcement authorities who provided dog handlers and even a police helicopter. At one point, it seemed that pretty much every local business in Pittsburgh was involved in some capacity.
Birth of the Living Dead provides a succinct overview about one of the most iconic movies of the sixties. It is affectionate and informative, although it does get a little bogged down when it tackles the socio-political element of the movie. There are some insightful interviews with horror filmmaker Larry Fessenden (who also executive produced the documentary), Walking Dead producer Gale Anne Hurd, and cultural commentators as Mark Harris, Elvis Mitchell and Jason Zinoman. At a little over seventy five minutes it manages to pack a lot in. I did find some of the material a little curious, such as the teacher at a Bronx elementary school who was enthusiastically extolling the virtues of the movie to a class of pre-teens. Also, the documentary does not in any way touch upon any of Romero's later work or sequels.
Documentaries have become increasingly more popular with mainstream viewers in recent years. The benchmark appears to be whether you can engage a viewer who is not overtly familiar with the subject matter. Birth of the Living Dead achieves this as well as appealing to the die-hard horror fan. There has been a great deal written about Romero's Night of the Living Dead over the years and a lot of DVD “extras” have paid lip service to his work. For the time being Birth of the Living Dead has put all such commentary in the shade, offering the definitive exploration of the movie.
Everything or Nothing: The Untold Story of 007 (2012)
Everything or Nothing: The Untold Story of 007 is a lot more than just some bit of fluff, promotional documentary celebrating the 50th anniversary of the Bond movies. It is quite a frank insight into the history of the Bond franchise, although it is very much told from the perspective of EON productions. The movie title comes from the production company acronym “Everything or Nothing” which was formed by Harry Saltzman and Albert “Cubby” Broccoli. Although somewhat partisan in its tone, this is not a rose-tinted exploration of the staggering success of Ian Fleming’s iconic character. The documentary does in fact make you rethink many notions you may have had about certain high profile Hollywood stars and producers.
Everything or Nothing: The Untold Story of 007 is a lot more than just some bit of fluff, promotional documentary celebrating the 50th anniversary of the Bond movies. It is quite a frank insight into the history of the Bond franchise, although it is very much told from the perspective of EON productions. The movie title comes from the production company acronym “Everything or Nothing” which was formed by Harry Saltzman and Albert “Cubby” Broccoli. Although somewhat partisan in its tone, this is not a rose-tinted exploration of the staggering success of Ian Fleming’s iconic character. The documentary does in fact make you rethink many notions you may have had about certain high profile Hollywood stars and producers.
Initially focusing on author Ian Fleming’s struggles to get the novels filmed, the curious catalogue of failures that brought Saltzman, Broccoli and United Artists together are quite fascinating. As the franchise grew and started to gain momentum it seems inevitable that all parties would eventually fallout. Artistic differences, financial remuneration, taxes and ego all played a part. Then of course there was the problem of how a joint writing venture with Kevin McClory led to rights disputes and a series of legal battles that would drag on for decades. It ultimately led to the unofficial Bond movie Never Say Never Again being made in 1983. Unlike other popular franchises the Bond series has also had to face the trauma of recasting it’s lead actor not once but five times.
The documentary speaks to all actors who have played Bond, except Sean Connery, although his views are still adequately represented by archive footage. There is considerable candour from George Lazenby, Timothy Dalton and Pierce Brosnan. Lazenby is very clear as to why he lost the role that he worked so hard to obtain. Dalton’s Bond suffered by arriving at a time when the franchise was in transition. He still remains in my view the Bond that deserved at least more film. Brosnan also gives an honest account of the effects of playing such an iconic role and how he vividly remembers the filming of Goldeneye, but how the sequels are all blurs. Everything or Nothing: The Untold Story of 007 is greatly enhanced by well-placed clips from the various movies to under pin the narrative, as well judicious use of John Barry’s various scores.
As previously mentioned the documentary’s candid approach doesn’t always paint a favourable picture. Mr. Connery is shown to apparently hold a grudge. Money often seems to be the cause of disharmony within the core production team. Plus many have frequently been or still remain tax exiles, a stance that seems to be increasingly unpopular in contemporary society. Yet despite the troubles that have beset the franchise over its fifty years, it still managed to reinvent itself and remain popular, commercial and relevant. What Everything or Nothing: The Untold Story of 007 demonstrates is that regardless of talent, marketing and the full weight of Hollywood, to be truly successful still requires an element of luck as well as being in the right place at the right time. This is why so many other lesser franchises will never get to celebrate a 50th anniversary.
For the Love of Spock (2016)
Adam Nimoy doesn’t paint a rosy picture of family life in his documentary about his father. The novelty of fame and popular acclaim soon wore off with it’s never ending photoshoots and long working hours that kept his father from ever being home. Yet among the anecdotes in this greatly condensed biopic there evidence of a lot of love and professional respect. Far from being comprehensive For the Love of Spock focuses on the matters that interest fans the most. So the documentary explores Nimoy’s relationship with Gene Roddenberry, his subsequent casting in Star Trek, his post Trek stage career and his return to the fold with the big screen movies.
Adam Nimoy doesn’t paint a rosy picture of family life in his documentary about his father. The novelty of fame and popular acclaim soon wore off with it’s never ending photoshoots and long working hours that kept his father from ever being home. Yet among the anecdotes in this greatly condensed biopic there evidence of a lot of love and professional respect. Far from being comprehensive For the Love of Spock focuses on the matters that interest fans the most. So the documentary explores Nimoy’s relationship with Gene Roddenberry, his subsequent casting in Star Trek, his post Trek stage career and his return to the fold with the big screen movies.
Although the documentary references the autobiography I Am Not Spock, which explored Nimoy’s struggle with his own identify and his on screen persona, it is not especially thorough. The actor eventually wrote a second book titled, I Am Spock that revealed he’d reconciled both the man and the character, something the documentary is more interested in exploring. There is an allusion to conflict in later life between father and son, though the reasons for it are not elaborated on. Both struggled with substance abuse and Adam himself hints at the strain of being in his father’s formidable shadow. For the Love of Spock also acknowledges the existence of “The Ballad of Bilbo Baggins” but sees fit to delve no further.
Many stars of the original TV series are interviewed along the way, as well the astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson and the cast of J. J. Abrams’s cinematic reboot. Leonard’s profound contributions to Star Trek TOS are dissected such as the phrase “Live long and prosper”, its accompanying hand gesture and the iconic Vulcan nerve pinch. Time is also spent on Nimoy’s exploration of Spock ongoing battle with his half-human emotions and how he wanted the character to grow. Leonard’s stage career, as well as his film directing is also acknowledged. Time is also spent reflecting Nimoy’s dualistic relationship with Paramount studios and his legal battles with them.
For the Love of Spock treads a fairly even path through the career of one of the most iconic actors of the twentieth century. It does not shy away from the human flaws of both Nimoy senior and junior. One can’t help feeling that there is more to say but because the production is a family affair then it is natural that a degree of privacy is maintained. The documentary wisely ends on the immense legacy of Leornard Nimoy and the enduring nature of his alter ego Spock. There is a positive message in the final summation and it is handled with dignity and quiet reflection. In many ways these are the traits that make Nimoy and Spock so appealing.
The Captains (2011)
The Captains is a curious beast. If you’re expecting a traditional documentary where Bill Shatner simply indulges in a standard Q & A with other actors that have portrayed captains within the Star Trek franchise, then you will be disappointed. The Captains is a horse of a different colour entirely. Throughout its ninety minute duration, this documentary veers from personal reflections on acting, muses upon the nature of fame and even touches upon contemplating one’s own mortality. It certainly wasn’t what I was expecting and was subsequently a far more rewarding experience.
The Captains is a curious beast. If you’re expecting a traditional documentary where Bill Shatner simply indulges in a standard Q & A with other actors that have portrayed captains within the Star Trek franchise, then you will be disappointed. The Captains is a horse of a different colour entirely. Throughout its ninety minute duration, this documentary veers from personal reflections on acting, muses upon the nature of fame and even touches upon contemplating one’s own mortality. It certainly wasn’t what I was expecting and was subsequently a far more rewarding experience.
Some viewers may see Mr Shatner as an egotistical one trick pony and this film as a colossal self-indulgence. I do not. I genuinely think that he is a passionate man who has wrestled with the pitfalls of international fame. He certainly is quite candid about times when his popular persona was a burden to him. Through the cross examining of his guests (and that is a very apt term at times) he highlights the parallels of what he has come to terms with. The documentary is somewhat erratic and eclectic yet through all its muddled musings does have points to make.
The interviewees are a curious bunch, to boot. If The Captains does anything, it is to highlight that an actors onscreen persona can often be radically different to their own. Kate Mulgrew discusses how the strong authoritative character she portrayed was the complete opposite of her in her family life. Avery Brooks could not be further from Benjamin Sisko if he tried. A talented pianist and an individual with a clear artistic temperament, his personal reflections are often extremely philosophical and on occasion impenetrable. Yet all of this contributes to the underlying narrative thrust of the documentary. Exactly what impact did being a “captain” have upon each actor.
The Captains is a little too long and languid for the casual viewer. A re-edit would certainly help make it more accessible such an audience. For hardcore Trekkies/Trekkers or those who have a fascination with actors, this documentary is informative and of merit. Bill Shatner is a potent personality. The scenes showing him interacting with fans at conventions and working the crowd are fascinating. I think that he genuinely feels for his audience. Certainly the influence of his fame has become clear to him. He appears to be conspicuously aware of being in his twilight years and wishes to use them as well as he can.
Room 237 (2012)
I knew very little about Room 237 prior to viewing, other than the fact it was a documentary about Stanley Kubrick's The Shining and that it explored the movies potential meaning. What is actually on offer is a movie about Kubrick fans and their personal interpretations. For those of a more charitable disposition director Rodney Ascher has created an ode to cinematic love. For those with a more sceptical demeanour, this is vehicle for exploring obsession and possibly an invitation to mock. Either way, it is very compelling viewing, despite being a little too long and a little too clever for its own good.
I knew very little about Room 237 prior to viewing, other than the fact it was a documentary about Stanley Kubrick's The Shining and that it explored the movies potential meaning. What is actually on offer is a movie about Kubrick fans and their personal interpretations. For those of a more charitable disposition director Rodney Ascher has created an ode to cinematic love. For those with a more sceptical demeanour, this is vehicle for exploring obsession and possibly an invitation to mock. Either way, it is very compelling viewing, despite being a little too long and a little too clever for its own good.
Room 237 caught me a little off guard, as it started with a selection of voice overs from fans, talking about their initial exposure to The Shining and reflecting upon how they each discovered the works of Stanley Kubrick. Then one individual said that the sixties were a "rather pathetic time...for film" and I sat up and took noticed, because that's not a position that you'll hear advocated very often. From then onwards the documentary continued to catalogue further "unconventional" views, all backed up with the most complex of reasons. The Shining became an allegory of the genocide of the Native Americans or alternatively the Holocaust, also a coded confession that Kubrick had faked the moon landings.
"Kubrick likes to make you think" it was claimed. I do not dispute this but there's thinking and then there's over-thinking. People often misconstrue applicability with allegory and I think what we have here are individuals that have simply seen what they want to see in The Shining, to validate their own pet theories and monomanias. Kubrick was indeed a highly skilled film maker but the likelihood that he could or would contrive to make a movie so heavily coded in subtext as these individual claim is frankly implausible. The cult of Kubrick plays a major part in this situation. I doubt if you'd find this level of dissection over the work of his contemporaries.
However I played along for the duration and did enjoy some of the lesser ideas banded about. I especially liked the concept of the move being played forward and backward, over each other, simultaneously. At the end of Room 237, I found myself pondering the same question that many viewers have raised already. Not whether the theories are true but does the documentary have a point? I believe that it does; that the obsessive and complex personality of director Stanley Kubrick is mirrored not only in his work but also in some of his fans. All three have a common connection based on intricacy. Ultimately one good thing did occur as a result of me watching Room 237; I immediately watched The Shining again.
Bringing Godzilla Down to Size (2008)
I recently stumbled across the documentary Bringing Godzilla Down To Size, which was originally included on Classic Media’s DVD release of the genre classics War Of The Gargantuas and Rodan. This in-depth and surprisingly engaging film explores the history of the Japanese Godzilla franchise and focuses on the special effects and technical aspects that dominated these productions. Technicians and actors are interviewed, providing a wealth of insight into the complexities of the films. This documentary also demonstrates the very unique nature of the Japanese film industry and its obsessive attention to detail.
I recently stumbled across the documentary Bringing Godzilla Down To Size, which was originally included on Classic Media’s DVD release of the genre classics War Of The Gargantuas and Rodan. This in-depth and surprisingly engaging film explores the history of the Japanese Godzilla franchise and focuses on the special effects and technical aspects that dominated these productions. Technicians and actors are interviewed, providing a wealth of insight into the complexities of the films. This documentary also demonstrates the very unique nature of the Japanese film industry and its obsessive attention to detail.
The main question asked by this film is why is Godzilla still principally played a man in a suit? At a time when Hollywood’s uses CGI at every potential opportunity, Japanese sci-fi movies still rely heavily on old-school techniques. Miniatures, physical effects and actors in animatronic costumes are still commons. For over fifty years, Godzilla, Mothra, King Ghidorah and other giant creatures have been brought to life in this old fashion manner. Is the Japanese effects industry just as traditional as other aspects of their culture? The documentary’s answer is surprisingly simple. The old techniques work
Narrated by Godzilla fan boy extreme, Alex Cox (director of Repo Man, Sid And Nancy), the film celebrates the art and craft of the Japanese monsters genre and reflects on the future of Godzilla in the digital age. Bringing Godzilla Down To Size reveals through a multitude of interviews, the love and respect that the technicians and artists have for this series. The meeting between the three actor/stuntmen that have played Godzilla over the years is quite touching. The documentary manages to tread the narrow path between informed narrative and gushing fan boy eulogy. It also provides a very interesting overview into the world of pre-digital visual effects.
Crystal Lake Memories: The Complete History of Friday the 13th
Crystal Lake Memories: The Complete History of Friday the 13th is an incredibly in-depth documentary that explores the making of one of the landmark horror franchises of the twentieth century. The film analyses the series from its low budget 1980s origin at a New Jersey summer camp to the blockbuster release of its 2009 “reboot.” It combines hundreds of rare and never-before-seen photographs and film clips, as well as outtakes, archival documents, conceptual art and behind-the-scenes footage. There is also a wealth of interviews with more than one hundred and fifty cast and crew members, spanning all twelve films and the television series.
Crystal Lake Memories: The Complete History of Friday the 13th is an incredibly in-depth documentary that explores the making of one of the landmark horror franchises of the twentieth century. The film analyses the series from its low budget 1980s origin at a New Jersey summer camp to the blockbuster release of its 2009 “reboot.” It combines hundreds of rare and never-before-seen photographs and film clips, as well as outtakes, archival documents, conceptual art and behind-the-scenes footage. There is also a wealth of interviews with more than one hundred and fifty cast and crew members, spanning all twelve films and the television series.
This documentary is pretty much the last word on the Friday the 13th franchise. Clocking in at over five hours it follows a set pattern exploring each movies development, casting, production and subsequent release. Narrated by Corey Feldman (of Tommy Jarvis fame) it is presented in an engaging and informative fashion. The personal anecdotes from the cast and crew prove to be extremely interesting and often reflect the reality of low budget film making. The documentary also catalogues the regular battles the producers had with the MPAA and shows a variety of out-takes and deleted material. Sadly some of the more violent content has been lost forever, as a memo from Paramount ordering the destruction of surplus footage shows.
Crystal Lake Memories: The Complete History of Friday the 13th also shows the great sense of camaraderie among the actors and crew that worked on these movies. It is often erroneously thought that appearing in such material is a low point in any actor’s career but this is not the case. Many in the acting profession embrace the practical realities of their industry and see merit and virtue in the most humblest of their work. They also see value in being part of a wider fan culture. Stuntman and actor Kane Hodder is especially gracious about the importance of fans and honest about how seriously he takes his work. Friday the 13th is a franchise that has always been driven by the enthusiasm of its audience. It is a shame that the current rights holders seem to have forgotten that.
The director Daniel Farrands previously made His Name Was Jason: 30 Years of Friday the 13th, but this new documentary puts that to shame. The sheer volume of information here is prodigious. However due to the sheer running time of Crystal Lake Memories: The Complete History of Friday the 13th it is not for everyone. For those with only a passing interest and less time available I would recommend the directors previous work. For the more dedicated film fan or Friday the 13th aficionado Crystal Lake Memories: The Complete History of Friday the 13th is the ultimate tribute to one of horror’s most iconic and enduring franchises.